naomi

well, moving seems to be the bane of glamatron blogrhythm; fortunately, maggie is keeping us going while i pack boxes and try to figure out why on earth i own three different black, knit, flounced miniskirts. i mean, really.

but while nursing the BWG, i’ve been making my way through the june issue of W (i’m sure this will give him something to talk with a therapist about some day) - though it was tough to get past that cover. ugh. i didn’t think it was even possible to take a bad picture of naomi campbell, but it turns out it is. i suppose the editorial staff was proud of doing the near-impossible, because they then felt obligated to put this dubious achievement on the cover. why? why is she wearing a trible? why does her make-up create imitation wrinkles around her eyes? - she doesn’t have them in real life. is someone on the editorial staff just jealous because the woman can make a hefty bag look like high fashion?

whatever it is, dude, it would have been better to put the picture of her in the clean-up crew vest on the cover. at least she can wear the hell out of orange…

Vanity Is as Vanity Does

Color by Etsy

Hell is . . .

why i am not a fashionista

someone wanted to know…

in praise of men

fun u.k. blog

glamatrons to the rescue: interview in 12 hours! what to wear?!?

godet non-non